Latest lawtech topics

‹ Back

Texas lawyer fined for AI use in latest sanction over fake citations 

 

Last month, a Texas lawyer was fined $2,000 and had to attend mandatory training on AI after he submitted a court filing containing citations to nonexistent legal cases, all generated by artificial intelligence. This is not the first incident in the US and the number of these incidents will continue to increase. This incident highlights a growing concern in the legal field that is integrating generative AI tools: the balance between efficiency and responsibility. 

 

The lawyer, Brandon Monk, representing a client in a wrongful termination case against Goodyear Tire & Rubber, used AI to draft court documents. The AI-generated text cited fabricated case law and quotations, which opposing counsel identified as false. U.S. District Judge Marcia Crone of the Eastern District of Texas penalized Monk for failing to verify the AI’s output and for neglecting to address these inaccuracies after they were flagged. This case underscores the critical ethical obligations of professionals, especially when relying on advanced technologies. 

 

 

Key Takeaways for Lawyers Using AI: 

 

Verification is essential: AI legal tools can assist in research and drafting court documents, but they are all prone to “hallucinations” or fabricating plausible-sounding information and case law. Lawyers must meticulously verify AI outputs before filing. 

 

Accountability remains human: The use of AI tools does not absolve lawyers of their responsibility to ensure accuracy and integrity in their work. 

 

Education and Regulation are Vital: This incident has spurred calls for comprehensive training on AI usage and stricter industry guidelines to mitigate risks. Judges and regulators are also increasingly emphasizing due diligence in the adoption of AI technologies. 

 

This incident serves as a cautionary tale for the lawyers and other legal professionals adopting AI. While generative AI has the potential to revolutionize workflows, its limitations demand careful oversight. As AI becomes more integrated into professional practice, maintaining public trust and ethical standards will be paramount.